Over 70 years since the first corporate campaigns to frame waste as a consumer problem, less than 9% of all plastic in the United States is actually recycled. The grand promise of recycling has largely failed, yet the narrative persists – keeping responsibility on individuals while plastic production has exponentially increased. The real costs of this corporate sleight of hand aren’t paid at the cash register but through mounting environmental contamination and public health impacts. Microplastics now permeate our bodies, oceans, soil, and air. Wildlife chokes on our discarded packaging. And communities near production facilities face elevated cancer rates and respiratory issues. All while the industry has known since the 1970s that recycling plastic was “unlikely to happen on a broad scale” and “infeasible.” The timeline below reveals how we arrived at this crisis through seven decades of corporate strategy.
Great articles and podcasts about Plastic Recycling
- Is Plastic Recycling A Lie? Oil Companies Touted Recycling To Sell More Plastic : NPR
- The Litter Myth : Throughline : NPR
- 5 Ways Big Beverage Sabotages Recycling Reform – Conservation Law Foundation
Timeline of U.S. Recycling Green-washed Marketing
1950s: Setting the Stage
- 1953: After Vermont bans disposable bottles, beverage and packaging companies (including Coca-Cola) form Keep America Beautiful (KAB) to combat litter without blaming corporations
- KAB’s core mission: convince Americans that litter is an individual responsibility, deflecting attention from the companies producing single-use containers
1970s: Framing the Narrative
- 1971: KAB airs iconic “Crying Indian” commercial with tagline “People start pollution. People can stop it.” The ad, funded by beverage and packaging firms, places responsibility on consumers while these companies fought regulation
- Mid-1970s: Beverage industry spends an estimated $20 million annually to defeat “bottle bills” (container deposit laws) that would make companies responsible for taking back bottles
- Industry promotes voluntary recycling as an alternative to mandatory deposits, shifting waste management responsibility to taxpayers and municipalities
1980s: Institutionalizing Consumer Responsibility
- 1980s: Industry helps popularize curbside recycling, joining waste haulers to lobby for government grants that would fund municipal collection (at taxpayer expense)
- 1988: Industry introduces the Resin Identification Code (numbers 1-7 inside recycling arrows), giving consumers the impression that all plastics are recyclable when most weren’t
- 1989: Society of the Plastics Industry president convenes executives from Exxon, Dow, DuPont, P&G to address plastic’s deteriorating public image. Their solution: “advertise our way out of it” through recycling campaigns
1990s: Promises and Pivots
- 1990: Industry launches “$50 million-per-year” public relations campaign including “Plastics Make it Possible” to improve plastic’s image and tout recycling
- 1990: Coca-Cola and PepsiCo announce plans to use recycled plastic in bottles to preempt minimum content legislation
- Early 1990s: Nearly all industry’s highly publicized recycling projects quietly shut down after a few years, proven economically unfeasible
- Mid-1990s: Coca-Cola and Pepsi halt use of recycled plastic in U.S. bottles once public interest wanes and legislative threats subside, reverting to 0% recycled content
- Example Plastic ads: https://digital.hagley.org/VID_1995300_B01_ID02
2000s-2010s: Recycling as Status Quo
- 2000s: Plastic production skyrockets for bottled water and consumer goods while recycling rates remain low
- Industry groups promote recycling under terms like “sustainability” and “circular economy” while resisting measures to limit single-use plastics
- 2014: Major brands create Closed Loop Fund, committing $100 million to finance recycling infrastructure improvements as plastic waste criticism grows
- 2018: China’s National Sword policy bans imported recyclables, exposing flaws in the U.S. recycling system as plastic waste piles up domestically
Recent Developments
- 2019: Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Keurig Dr Pepper launch Every Bottle Back initiative, investing $100 million to improve recycling as only one-third of their 100 billion plastic bottles sold annually were being recycled
- 2020: NPR/PBS investigation reveals industry executives knew as far back as the 1970s that widespread plastic recycling was “unlikely to happen on a broad scale” and was “costly” and “infeasible”
- 2023: EPA recommends dropping the chasing arrows symbol on plastics, acknowledging it misleads consumers to believe items are recyclable when they often aren’t
- 2023: Studies on health impacts of micro-plastics begin coming out: Potential Health Impact of Microplastics: A Review of Environmental Distribution, Human Exposure, and Toxic Effects | Environment & Health
- 2023 – 2025: Coca-Cola’s 100% Plant-Based Bottle – Packaging Gateway
The Strategy Revealed
Internal industry documents and testimonies show the recycling narrative served to:
- Deflect responsibility from producers to consumers
- Preempt regulation that would restrict single-use packaging
- Allow continued growth of disposable products
- Create a perception that plastic waste was manageable through individual action
“Selling recycling sold plastic”
As one former plastics industry president admitted: “Selling recycling sold plastic” — if consumers believed the recycling loop worked, they continued buying disposable products without guilt.
Selling recycling continues to sell plastic and sales are good.
